Oh, well, aren’t you an interesting little turn of events.
(Spoiler alert: McCourt agreed to sell the Dodgers, if you didn’t hear. And if you didn’t, I will wait while you do a happy dance. … Okay, ready?)
When he spoke out last fall, in urging owner Frank McCourt to sell the Dodgers, O’Malley said he had no interest in returning as owner or president of the team.
McCourt agreed to sell on Tuesday, in an abrupt end to his two-year court fight to retain ownership of the Dodgers.
“The health of the organization has deteriorated in the last 12 months,” O’Malley said. “The standing of the organization in the community has deteriorated.
“I am confident I can restore it to respectability quicker, sooner and probably better than — or at least as well as — anyone else.”
I’m pre-empting the argument that the O’Malleys shouldn’t have sold the team in the first place; it’s not their fault that this mess happened and it wasn’t financially feasible for them to retain ownership at the time, so let’s not go there. Aside from that, what are everyone’s thoughts on this?
-
achleedawn liked this
-
suleepropaganda liked this
-
redheaded liked this
-
lookitzedgar liked this
-
tug0fworm reblogged this from dodgers
-
xxdomesticgoddessxx answered:
finally! about time this man grew up enough to admit defeat and walk away for the good of the team, community and game as a whole!!
-
tinseltowncloud answered:
It’d be good to have him as a figurehead but he should be careful as he has so much goodwill now it would be sad to lose it.
-
siliconhutong answered:
The history of sports (and the Dodgers) proves that the most valuable asset any athletic club can have is passionate and patient leadership.
-
dinghysailingpirates reblogged this from dodgers
-
noelanthony liked this
-
dodgers posted this
